On a high level, when you think about how inefficient the current fractured system of nations, regulations, laws, trade and currencies is, it makes you wonder, will the people of the world see themselves as better off economically and environmentally if there was more global cooperation, and more legal, regulatory and trade standardization?
And won't there be more momentum for this concept, given the ongoing global financial meltdown, the rapidly expanding and internet-driven global information and trade integration, and the onset of global warming?When you see how the sovereign independent nations of Europe have combined into the EU and Euro, considering their history of conflict and fierce nationalism, you wonder, will it stop there?Hmmmm....Oh, maybe this little piece of text has you nervousRevelation 13:16-17 And he causes all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a MARK in their right hand, or in their foreheads. And that no man might buy or sell, save him that had the MARK, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. Or is this all already in the cards, a New World Order, controlled by a secretive and powerful cabal?But maybe this will be impossible, considering the upcoming (and ongoing) commodity wars, as the world runs low on oil, minerals, water and food?When you think about it though, at least on the monetary front, wouldn't a sound digital currency like a UN issued e-Gold solve a lot? Wouldn't it be better than the dollar-driven fiat currency mess we have today?I'm freaking you out, eh?So, what would it take for the people of the world, via their governments, to agree to a world government, and a one-world currency? Will people 1,000 years from now look back at the wars and problems of the past 2,000 years, and wonder - 'what took them so long'.
Or will it never, ever happen?Here's Gideon Rachman, writing in the Financial Times on this very subject.
Hmmmm.... Pretty freaky....And now for a world governmentBy Gideon RachmanI have never believed that there is a secret United Nations plot to take over the US. I have never seen black helicopters hovering in the sky above Montana. But, for the first time in my life, I think the formation of some sort of world government is plausible.
A “world government” would involve much more than co-operation between nations. It would be an entity with state-like characteristics, backed by a body of laws. The European Union has already set up a continental government for 27 countries, which could be a model. The EU has a supreme court, a currency, thousands of pages of law, a large civil service and the ability to deploy military force.
So could the European model go global? There are three reasons for thinking that it might.First, it is increasingly clear that the most difficult issues facing national governments are international in nature: there is global warming, a global financial crisis and a “global war on terror”.
Second, it could be done. The transport and communications revolutions have shrunk the world so that, as Geoffrey Blainey, an eminent Australian historian, has written: “For the first time in human history, world government of some sort is now possible.” Mr Blainey foresees an attempt to form a world government at some point in the next two centuries, which is an unusually long time horizon for the average newspaper column.
But – the third point – a change in the political atmosphere suggests that “global governance” could come much sooner than that. The financial crisis and climate change are pushing national governments towards global solutions, even in countries such as China and the US that are traditionally fierce guardians of national sovereignty.