data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8ddcc/8ddcc8f28302ae65734ffc9b9d51a5297a17c852" alt=""
See ya 2008.
You sucked.
But oh, wait until you see 2009.
May you live in interesting times.
So, what will it be?
A) We keep crashing
B) Things settle down
C) Off to the races with 0% and trillion dollar money bombs
A politically incorrect pamphlet hitting on all the unspeakable stuff: Politics. Economics. Fiscal Policy. Foreign Policy. Moral Issues. Culture. Investments. Religion. Humor. Life.
Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy
And the US should be out buying up everything it can.
Especially oil.
Wars will soon be fought over commodities, even though they're being given away at fire-sale prices today.
And even though it doesn't look like it, THIS is when the serious money is being made.
Buy low, sell high, and may you live in interesting times.
Donors who have contributed between $10 million–$25 million:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: The royal family wants to remain a loyal U.S. ally, and keep their image clean. The Saudis give to every former president’s library or foundation, so this is a regular part of doing business for them.
Donors who have contributed between $1 million–$5 million:
Sheikh Mohammed H. Al-Amoudi: An Ethiopian-born Saudi businessman whose businesses extend from oil and gas to gold. He made his first fortune in construction and real estate before branching out into buying oil refineries in Sweden and Morocco. Today he is reportedly one the largest foreign investors in both Sweden, where he was honoured with the Royal Swedish Order of the North Star by King Carl XVI — and his native Ethiopia, where he bankrolls the national soccer team.
Nasser Al-Rashid: A 69 year old Saudi businessman. Chairman of Rashid Engineering, he is described in a biography listed at University of Texas, his alma mater, as an engineering consultant to Saudi King Fahd and the Saudi royal court. He received a Ph.D. from UT in engineering, and has built the Dr. Nasser Al-Rashid Strength and Training Center there. According to the UT Web site, Rashid Engineering was grossing over $2 billion a year by 1980, and had become the kingdom’s largest engineering firm, designing more than 100 major projects. Rashid’s corporate Web site says that the firm designed the Riyadh-Dammam highway, the road that leads from the Saudi capital to the oil-rich region in the eastern half of the kingdom; the governorate and administrative offices in Saudi’s oil rich Eastern Province and the King Fahd Holy Koran Printing Complex, the major Saudi religious text book publisher.
Gilbert R. Chagoury: A Lebanese Christian businessman with an industrial fortune in Nigeria. The Chagoury Group has become one of the leading Africa based corporations in Nigeria, with manufacturing, construction, industrial, hotels and high technology companies
Dubai Foundation: Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, the ruler of Dubai, set up this $10 billion foundation in May 2007 to improve the standard of education and research and to stimulate job creation in the Middle East. It is unclear how donations to the Clinton foundation help spur those objectives. But Sheikh Mohammed is also the majority owner of most of the major Dubai companies, like Dubai Ports World, the port manager that became embroiled in the congressional battle and ultimately was prevented from taking over management of various US ports in 2005. DP World’s parent company Dubai World owns significant stakes in gambling and hospitality industries as well as real estate projects in Los Vegas and Los Angeles. Clinton has business interests with Dubai together with Ron Burkle.
Mr. Issam M. Fares & The Wedge Foundation: He is the deputy prime minister of Lebanon and an international financier. Fares heads a broad collection of banks, factories, and companies in the Middle East, Europe and the United States through the Wedge Group, an investment firm based in the United States. This is all according to his personal Web site. Among his Wedge Group holdings: the Food Corporation International, an American exporter of staples such as rice; and Ballast-Nedam, the largest Dutch construction company.
Friends of Saudi Arabia: This is a U.S. based non-profit. The group is made up of former diplomats and U.S. businessmen with interests in Saudi Arabia. Officially, they say that they work to address cultural and educational links between Saudi Arabia and the U.S. Their major objective is to massage the image of the Kingdom and the portrayal of Muslims and Islam within the U.S. and its media outlets. Funding comes from the Saudi royal family.
State of Kuwait: The Kuwait royal family. Eternal gratitude for saving their country is a big enough reason to give to every former president. No outstanding foreign policy issues that butt up against U.S. interests or goals. The Kuwaiti sovereign wealth fund has massive U.S. investments, in the financial sector and elsewhere.
State of Qatar: The Qatari royal family. Qatar is host to two U.S. military bases, and the country is a very close Gulf ally.
The Sultanate of Oman: The Omani ruler is the big defense client of the U.S. It also has a free trade agreement with the U.S that was signed during the Bush administration. Oman is not a big player in regional or foreign policy issues, so unclear what direct issue they would be gunning for in exchange for the donation. In the Gulf, if one royal family gets wind that another is giving a gift, they have to match to save face. That’s one reason why we could have Kuwait, Qatar, Oman and the U.A.E all in the same monetary bracket.
The Zayed Family: This is the ruling family of Abu Dhabi and the U.A.E. Abu Dhabi is the real power of the country, the silent, deep-pocketed rulers to Dubai’s nouveau riche brashness. Dubai can form its own trade policies, but Abu Dhabi controls national policy. The U.A.E is currently negotiating to buy a reported $9 billion in U.S. missile defense technology. The Pentagon is on board, but it is possibly contentious from Israel’s point of view. Additionally, the U.A.E is looking to sign a nuclear cooperation agreement with the U.S., something that members of Congress are already looking to spoil due to concerns about the U.A.E’s close trade relationship– and lax banking and trade regulations–with Iran. Additionally, the Abu Dhabi sovereign wealth funds have major investment interests in the U.S., including in Citigroup and General Electric.
Let me start with some general observations about monetary policy at the zero bound, sweeping under the rug for the moment some technical and operational issues.
As I have mentioned, some observers have concluded that when the central bank's policy rate falls to zero--its practical minimum--monetary policy loses its ability to further stimulate aggregate demand and the economy. At a broad conceptual level, and in my view in practice as well, this conclusion is clearly mistaken. Indeed, under a fiat (that is, paper) money system, a government (in practice, the central bank in cooperation with other agencies) should always be able to generate increased nominal spending and inflation, even when the short-term nominal interest rate is at zero.
The conclusion that deflation is always reversible under a fiat money system follows from basic economic reasoning. A little parable may prove useful: Today an ounce of gold sells for $300, more or less. Now suppose that a modern alchemist solves his subject's oldest problem by finding a way to produce unlimited amounts of new gold at essentially no cost. Moreover, his invention is widely publicized and scientifically verified, and he announces his intention to begin massive production of gold within days. What would happen to the price of gold? Presumably, the potentially unlimited supply of cheap gold would cause the market price of gold to plummet. Indeed, if the market for gold is to any degree efficient, the price of gold would collapse immediately after the announcement of the invention, before the alchemist had produced and marketed a single ounce of yellow metal.
What has this got to do with monetary policy? Like gold, U.S. dollars have value only to the extent that they are strictly limited in supply. But the U.S. government has a technology, called a printing press (or, today, its electronic equivalent), that allows it to produce as many U.S. dollars as it wishes at essentially no cost. By increasing the number of U.S. dollars in circulation, or even by credibly threatening to do so, the U.S. government can also reduce the value of a dollar in terms of goods and services, which is equivalent to raising the prices in dollars of those goods and services. We conclude that, under a paper-money system, a determined government can always generate higher spending and hence positive inflation.